Managing up as a marketer means making it easier for your manager to set priorities and make good decisions. It is not flattery, mind-reading, or taking responsibility for every unclear request. The practical skill is to surface the decision, evidence, constraints, and trade-offs early enough that the work can move without surprise.
Start by diagnosing what the request is missing
A request such as “we need more leads,” “make this campaign bigger,” or “can you fix the site?” sounds actionable but leaves key decisions open. Before building a deck or starting execution, identify which part is unclear: the business outcome, target audience, decision owner, deadline, available budget, acceptable risk, or definition of success.
| Clarifying question | What it prevents |
|---|---|
| What outcome are we trying to change? | Work that produces activity without solving the stated business problem. |
| Who is the audience or segment? | A campaign brief that mixes buyers with different needs or constraints. |
| What decision do you need from me, and by when? | Status updates that never move the work to an approval or next action. |
| What must stay fixed: budget, timing, claims, tools, or scope? | Recommendations that are impossible to implement or unsafe to publish. |
| How will we judge the first result? | Arguments later about whether the work did what it was asked to do. |
You do not need to ask all five questions every time. Ask only what changes the work. If the leader is moving quickly, offer a short assumption and ask them to correct it: “I am treating this as a pipeline-quality problem for existing target accounts, not a request to increase form fills. Is that the decision you want?”
Bring a decision brief instead of a status dump
When the request has real cost or cross-team consequences, prepare a compact brief that lets your manager choose. A useful brief contains the request in your own words, the decision needed, two or three plausible options, the evidence behind them, key assumptions, the trade-off, the recommended next step, and the person who must approve it.
For example, if leadership asks to expand paid activity because the pipeline looks light, the options might be to increase spend in the current segment, test a new audience with a capped experiment, or first repair tracking and sales follow-up. State what each option can answer and what it cannot. Do not disguise an uncertain result as a forecast.
A good recommendation is not always the most ambitious option. It is the option that best fits the objective, evidence, available capacity, and risk tolerance. If you disagree with the preferred direction, say so plainly, explain the consequence, and offer a workable alternative.
Learn your manager’s context without hiding bad news
John Gabarro and John Kotter’s classic Harvard Business Review article on managing your boss frames the relationship as something employees can actively understand and improve. Learn which decisions your manager owns, what information they need, how they prefer to review options, and where they are under pressure. Adapt the format and timing of your communication, but keep the evidence and risks honest.
Send bad news early, while options still exist. A delayed launch, broken tracking event, weak creative test, or missing sales follow-up is easier to manage when you state the impact, what you know, what remains uncertain, and the decision needed. If you only report a problem, your manager has to do the diagnosis. If you bring an unsupported answer, they have to redo it.
Make trade-offs visible when priorities change
When a new executive request arrives, do not quietly add it to a full plan and hope the team absorbs the work. Show what it will displace, what can be reduced, and which deadline or outcome is affected. Ask the manager to choose the trade-off or confirm who has the authority to do so.
A useful response is: “We can take this on by Friday if we pause [current item] or reduce [planned scope]. The first option protects the launch date; the second keeps the reporting work moving. Which outcome matters more this week?” This keeps the discussion focused on choices rather than personal resistance.
Create a light communication cadence
| Moment | What to send | What it enables |
|---|---|---|
| Weekly priority check | Top outcomes, changed assumptions, and one decision that needs the manager. | Fast agreement on what moves and what stays. |
| Risk alert | Impact, confidence level, available options, and the decision deadline. | Intervention before the risk becomes an emergency. |
| After a decision | Owner, next action, due date, and any boundary or approval. | A reliable handoff without reopening the discussion. |
| Monthly learning review | What the work taught us, what did not work, and what to test next. | A better plan instead of a longer activity report. |
Keep the cadence proportional to the work. A small reversible change may need a concise message. A large spend, customer claim, or cross-functional change may need a written brief. Scale Orbit’s decision-rights map helps show who decides when a request crosses team boundaries; the intake process for unplanned sales requests offers a related way to make incoming work visible.
Know when managing up is not enough
Some problems are not solved by better formatting. If a request requires an unsupported public claim, mishandles customer data, or asks you to bypass a required approval, state the concern and use the organization’s proper escalation route. If priorities repeatedly change without an owner willing to choose what stops, document the pattern and ask for a planning decision. Managing up should improve clarity; it should not turn into silently accepting unlimited responsibility.
Sources and further reading
This approach adapts the relationship and communication principles in John Gabarro and John Kotter’s Harvard Business Review article “Managing Your Boss”. For expectation-setting and regular manager conversations, see Gallup’s manager-development guide.
How did this article land?
Choose one reaction. You can change it anytime.